Vijay Sao @ Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54800 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2020 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== VIJAY SAO @ VIJAY KUMAR Son of Late Raju Sao Resident of Village - Amrit Gegaha, Ward No.1, P.S.- Daudnagar, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 324, 323, 307, 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons entered into the house of the informant and for demand of Rs. Five Lakhs, indiscriminately assaulted the informant's side by means of various weapons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54800 of 2021(2) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 252 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/-shikha/- U T