Ram Charitra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9272 of 2005 ====================================================== Ram Charitra Mahto Son of late Shiv Mahto, Resident of Mohalla Brahampura, Soda Godown Chowk, P.O. M.I.T. Ward No.2, DistrictMuzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1.The State of Bihar through the Collector, Muzaffarpur

2. the Sub Divisional Officer (East) Muzaffarpur

3. The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur

4. The Administrator, Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur

5. Nawal Kishore Singh son of late Ram Bujhawan Singh Resident of Mohalla Brahampura, P.O. M. I.T. P.S. Brahampura, Dist. Muzaffarpur. 6.Mahendra Mahto son of late Shiv Mahto Resident of Mohalla Brahampura soda Godown chowk, P.O. M.I.T. Ward no.2, Dist. Muzaffarpur.

7. Satya Narain Prasad Secretary, Panchdeo Nath Mandir Development Committee Mohalla Brahampura P.O. M. I.T. Dist. Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. (Aag3) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 06-10-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Heard the counsel for the State.

The writ application seeks a direction upon the respondents to restore the possession of the petitioner over the disputed land in the light of an interim order of status quo with respect to the disputed land passed by the Additional Munsif-3rd, Muzaffarpur in Title Suit No. 192 of 1990.

It has rightly been pointed out by the State that if the order has been treated in breach the petitioner has remedy

Patna High Court CWJC No.9272 of 2005 (4) dt.06-10-2015 2/2 before the Civil Court itself. The writ application appears to be mis-conceived .

It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U