← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54804/2021bail granted

Munna Prajapat v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54804 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2020 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Munna Prajapat S/O Ganesh Prajapat R/O Village-Utalibara, P.O-Utalibara, P.S- Tankuppa, District-Gaya.

2.

Indradeo Prajapat S/O Lidhari Prajapat R/O Village-Utalibara, P.OUtalibara, P.S- Tankuppa, District-Gaya. 3.

Chandradeo Prajapat S/O Govind Prajapat R/O Village-Utalibara, P.OUtalibara, P.S- Tankuppa, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binoy Kumar Sinha 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State via virtual mode.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant by means of lathi danda and rod due to which he received injury. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is counter version of the occurrence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54804 of 2021(2) dt.08-04-2022 2/2 also and both sides sustained injuries and the land dispute is also going on between the parties. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24361 of 2021. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM(I), Gaya in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 60 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T