Anil Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17820 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -278 Year- 2017 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Anil Paswan son of late Devan Paswan

2. Manoj Paswan son of Sevak Paswan

3. Pawan Paswan son of Mandeshwar Paswan

4. Balla Paswan son of late Ramu Paswan

5. Sunil Paswan son of Devan Paswan All residents of village Mohammadpur Gokhul Kothi, P.S. Sakra, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sakra P.S.Case No.278 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with the other accused persons assaulted the informant and took him to the field and assaulted by Hasuli.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have been falsely implicated in this case and no specific allegation has been attributed against him and the injuries are

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17820 of 2018 (3) dt.18-06-2018 2/2 simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned sub Judge XIII-cum-ACJM, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S.case No.278 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T