Shamsa Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10204 of 2024 ====================================================== Shamsa Khatoon Wife of Kabir Ahmad Resident of Village and P.O. - Ahiyapur, Ward No. 05, P.S.- Sahebganj in the district of Muzaffarpur (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate at Muzaffarpur in the district of Muzaffarpur.

2.

The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

3.

The District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Block Education Officer, Sahebganj in the district of Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Headmaster-in-charge at Primary School at Ahiyapur (Urdu) in-charge of Talimi Markar Centre at Ahiyapur, Sahebgang Block in the district of Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Md. Kamil Akhtar, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Having gone through the case in its entirety and heard learned counsel for the parties, it would be deem, fit, proper and in the interest of justice, to relegate the case of the petitioner before the concerned authority for just and proper decision.

2. Accordingly, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.3) along with the documents, which have been annexed in this writ application, in support of his claim, within a period of two weeks from today. The District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.3) is directed

Patna High Court CWJC No.10204 of 2024(2) dt.26-07-2024 2/2 to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing, if necessary, and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

3. It is made clear that respondent no.3 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U