← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43671/2019bail granted

Sindhu Kumar Yadav @ Sidhu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-16Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43671 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2019 Thana- AUANGARI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

SINDHU KUMAR YADAV @ SIDHU KUMAR YADAV Son of Anil Yadav Resident of Village - Rasalpur, P.S.- Aungari, Distt - Nalanda. 2.

Sunil Yadav Son of Sadhu Yadav Resident of Village - Rasalpur, P.S.- Aungari, Distt - Nalanda.

3.

Titu Yadav Son of Sunil Yadav Resident of Village - Rasalpur, P.S.- Aungari, Distt - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend thjeir arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506/34 IPC registered in connection with Aungari P.S. Case No. 30/2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of quarrel between children and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusations are general and omnibus and the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Raghubir Prasad, learned ACJM, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Aungari P.S. Case No. 30/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43671 of 2019(2) dt.16-07-2019 2/2 under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T