Asha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17032 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2017 Thana -PARAIYA District- GAYA ====================================================== Asha Devi, Wife of Ravindra Yadav, Resident of Village - Prabhua, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Paraiya P.S. Case No. 187 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 325, 307, 353, 386, 387, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner in the written report. Petitioner is lady and has got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No. 187

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17032 of 2018 (4) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Shefali Narayan, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T