Shambhu Narayan Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4884 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Shambhu Narayan Singh S/O- Late Kamla Prasad Singh, Resident of village & P.O.- Parsarma, P.S. & District- Supaul, at present posted as R.C.D. Road, Division, Saharsa

2. Nagendra Prasad Yadav, S/o- Late Mahabir Prasad Yadav, Resident of village- Nemua, P.O.- Anandpura, P.S.- Udakishunganj, DistrictMadhepura, at present posted as R.C.D. Road, Division, Saharsa

3. Surendra Singh S/o- Late Brajnandan Singh, Resident of villageJamunapur, P.O. Alawalpur, P.S.- Gourichak, District- Patna, at present Posted as R.C.D., Road Division, Saharsa

4. Ugrakant Jha son of Late Nityanand Jha, resident of Ward No. 9, P.O. and P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of P.W.D. Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Works Commissioner, P.W.D., Road Circle, Saharsa, DistrictSaharsa

4. The Superintendent Engineer, P.W.D. Road Circle, Saharsa

5. The Chief Engineer, P.W.D., Road, Darbhanga

6. The Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Road Division, Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish, SC-21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 14528 of 2012 (Birendra Narayan Jha & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4884 of 2016 (2) dt.14-09-2018 2 /2 In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and relief of the case of petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.

The Authority will complete the whole process within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny U