Md. Tajemul Haque @ Tajmul Haque @ Md. Tajemul @ Md. Tajemul Haque v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43395 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- Sri Nagar District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Tajemul Haque @ Tajmul Haque @ Md. Tajemul @ Md. Tajemul Haque S/o- Late Md. Kalam Village- Chandghat Ward No- 14 PS- Sri Nagar DisttPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Bibi Aklema Khatoon W/o- Md. Abedullah Village- Pipar Tola Devi Nagar, W.No-1, Ps- Sri Nagar Dist- Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate For the informant :
Mr. Diwakar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Rounak Kumar Singh (Pankaj), Advocate Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, the learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 64(1) of the BNS and Section 3⁄4 of the POCSO Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of committing rape with a minor victim at 01:00 AM in the night.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43395 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as the learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. The learned counsel for the informant submits that the victim has supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T