Patna High CourtCWJC/2119/2015disposed

Jai Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-04Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2119 of 2015 ====================================================== Jai Prakash Singh son of late Ram Pravesh Rai, aged about 30 years old, resident of village Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibag, District Patna, .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar,

2. The District Magistrate, Patna,

3. Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna,

4. Superintending Engineer, Bhawan Anchal, Patna,

5. Assistant Engineer, Public Health Sub Division Secretariat, Patna,

6. Deputy Collector Incharge, District Development Section, Patna,

7. Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, P.H.E.D., Government of Bihar, Patna, .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Hamid Akhtar, AC to AAG 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, P.H.E.D., Government of Bihar, Patna, as respondent no. 7 in this writ application.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In view of the limited prayer made at the time of hearing, this writ application is being disposed of, without going into the merit of the case, with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 7 for redressal of his grievances. In case such a representation along with a copy of this order is filed by the petitioner, let the respondent no. 7 consider it and take a decision on its own merit and in accordance with law within a period of

Patna High Court CWJC No.2119 of 2015 (3) dt.04-02-2015 two months from the date of its filing.

It is made clear that if it is found that the petitioner has worked and some amount is due to be paid to him, then the same be paid to him immediately. In case any adverse decision is taken against the petitioner, then such decision should be immediately communicated to him.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U