Dilip Ram @ Dilip Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44886 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2022 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

DILIP RAM @ DILIP RAY Son of Ramlal Ray @ Ram Lalla Ray Resident of Village - Bhutha, P.s.- Churaut, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 2.

Jaynath Sah Son of Ram Vriksh Sah Resident of Village - Haripur Bokan, P.S.- Bhulari, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Dagarwa P.S. Case No. 181/2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of total 223.950 liters foreign liquor from a Bus in question. The petitioners and others apprehended on the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44886 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioner no.1 was Khalasi of the said bus and the petitioner no.2 was passenger of the said bus and they have no concern with the recovered illicit liquor. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 20.06.2022 and bear no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case as submitted and keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioners and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Court No.-I, Purnea in connection with Dagarwa P.S. Case No. 181/2022, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44886 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 3/3 or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioners will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T