Sonelal And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2125 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Sonelal Son of Late Kishori Ram Resident of Mohalla- Madhubani Bazar, Bajpatti, Police station- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi.

2. Hardeo Poddar Son of Late Khublal Poddar Resident of Mohalla- Hawai Adda, Katihar, Police Station- Mirchai Bari, District- Katihar.

3. Bhogendra Jha Son of Late Bishwanath Jha Resident of village-Ahmada, Police Station -Raj Nagar, District- Madhubani.

4. Ganesh Kumar Mishra Son of Late Shiv Shankar Mishra Resident of villageSagarpur, police Station-Sakari, District- Madhubani.

5. Md. Mohsin Son of Late Sabal Resident of Mohalla- Kasba Lakhana, Police Station- Kasba, District- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Building Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chief Engineer, North Bihar, Building Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Building Circle, Purnea.

5. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Purnea.

6. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Kishanganj.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dinbandhu Singh, GP 9 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-02-2015 Annexure- 2 is the fall out of a direction issued in Annexure- 1. Annexure- 1 is dated 5.9.2005. Annexure- 2 is dated 22.2.2006 and 23.2.2006. A settled position for more than 10 years is not required to be unsettled now at the convenience of the petitioners. If they have sat over the right, an order of the year 2006 is not required to be interfered with especially when Annexure- 2 has

Patna High Court CWJC No.2125 of 2015 dt.04-02-2015 2/2 a direct correlation with the earlier direction issued. If the petitioners had any grievance, they should have approached the Court immediately after Annexure- 2 series was issued. The explanation offered at paragraph 15 does not convince the Court as to the reason for such belated action on the part of the petitioners. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U