Mahadeo Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2693 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Mahadeo Jha, Son of Ramchandra Jha, Resident of Village - Ganaun, P.S. - Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

4. The District Mining Officer, Darbhanga.

5. The Circle Officer, Gora Boram, Darbhanga.

6. The Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Bihar, Patna through the Joint Secretary.

7. The Bihar State Pollution Control Board through its Chairman, BELTRON Bhawan, Patna.

8. The Member Secretary, The Bihar State Pollution Control Board, BELTRON Bhawan, Patna.

9. The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority , (SEIAA), Bihar, Patna through the Chairman.

10. The Member Secretary, The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, (SEIAA), Bihar, Patna.

11. M/s Heera Ita Udyog through its proprietor Shashidhar Jha, situated at Village - Aadharpur, P.S. - Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amish Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, AAG-11. Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 31-08-2015 Heard Mr. Amish Kumar Jha, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, learned Additional Advocate General No.11, appearing on behalf of the State Respondents, and Mr. Shivendra Kishore, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of B.P.S.C.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2693 of 2015 (3) dt.31-08-2015 2/2 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to make appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U