Patna High CourtCWJC/18932/2016disposal with observation

Pushpa Sahni v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-09Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18932 of 2016 =========================================================== Pushpa Sahni Wife of Shri Kapildeo Sahani, Resident of Village- Naya Ganga Sagar, Near Sarvodya High School, P.O. Lal Bagh, P.S. Laheria Sarai, District Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Principal Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Principal Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7. The Director, Directorate of Mass Education, Department of Secondary, Primary and Adult Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Partha Sarthi-GA4 Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, AC to GA4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 22208 of 2013 (Baliram Ram Singh & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) which has been affirmed by the Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 2307 of 2016, the aforesaid orders squarely cover the issue involved in the present case.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18932 of 2016 dt.09-10-2018 2 /2 In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of the petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid cases, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date10.10.2018 Transmission Date NA