Rahul Kashyap v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14916 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Rahul Kashyap, Son of Pankaj Kashyap, resident of Mohalla- 127/1, Green Park, A Block Jessor Road, Police Station- Lake Town, DistrictKolkata (West Bengal). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Puja Kumar, Wife of Rahul Kashyap, daughter of Chandra Narayan Singh, at present resident of Village- Pakardih Mocharim, Poice StationBodh Gaya, District- Gaya. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Manish Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 17 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He is ready to keep his wife. Heard learned A.P.P. also as well as learned counsel for the informant.

Learned counsel for the informant submitted that she is ready to live with his husband. The learned counsel for the informant draws attention to this court towards para-9 of the petition regarding arrest of the petitioner as also learned A.P.P. at para 3 of the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner has earlier prayed for bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14916 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 before the learned Sessions Judge who also directed him to surrender before court below. The court below in view of the facts, in compliance of aforesaid direction and considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner surrender before the court below on 24.4.2017 and on that date O.P. No. 2 will also appear in court. If the petitioner files affidavit on that date mentioning therein that he is ready to keep the O.P. No.2, the learned court below shall release the petitioner on provisional bail for a period of six months to its own satisfaction and he will monitor both parties for period of six months and only after being satisfied on account of conduct of the parties in six months, he will confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner, otherwise, he may pass any other order as may deem fit and proper.

In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner in connection with Complaint Case No. 17 of 2016, pending before the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. Accordingly, this application is disposed off. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Ravi/- U T