Richa @ Karu @ Lavlin Gope @ Laulin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43552 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2025 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== Richa @ Karu @ Lavlin Gope @ Laulin Yadav son of Late Bengali Gope village- Mirjapur, Nohta, P.S. -Fatuha, District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravish Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 121(2), 132, 303(2), 125(1), 324(5), 324(6), 326(g) and 352 of the BNS as well as Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that police on information went to the place of occurrence where they found a dead body lying on account of road accident. The dead body was sent for postmortem. Further, the mob which had gathered created ruckus and put the tractor on fire and committed loot of cement bag loaded on the tractor and the accused persons were identified based on the video footage.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43552 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant because of his antecedent. It is further submitted that petitioner is a resident of the place where the accident had taken place as such he had also gone to the place of occurrence when he came to be implicated.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T