Shashi Bhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12094 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2017 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Shashi Bhushan Singh, son of Late Rameshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Kunwapur, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh For the informant : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Peepra P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case only on the ground that earlier he had contested mukhiya election against the mother of the informant and had also lost that election. Further so far criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it has been submitted that those case are of the year 2007 and 2005 and in all those cases, petitioner's name had come only on the basis of suspicion and in this case also there is nothing against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12094 of 2017 (2) dt.23-03-2017 2/3 petitioner save and except suspicion.

Heard learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant, they have opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that prior to occurrence of the deceased, the petitioner used to threaten the deceased. However learned counsel for the informant could not produce any paper with regard to any complaint or sanha lodged with regard to the said threatening.

Having heard both sides, no doubt petitioner has criminal antecedent as he is accused in two other cases but in the present case, save and except suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner, as such, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Peepra P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12094 of 2017 (2) dt.23-03-2017 3/3 concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U