Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54367 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2018 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR SON OF LALAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAGHO DIHARA, P.S.- SURYAPURA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM, AT PRESENT MOHALLA- BEDA RADIO STATION (INFRONT OF), P.S.- SASARAM (M), DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2021 Heard both sides.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.74 of 2018 registered under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner had been rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.02.2021 passed in Cr.Misc.No.24987 of 2020. The petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2018. On perusal of the report received from the Additional District & Sessions Judge-XV, Rohtas at Sasaram, it appears that the trial of the case is at the stage of evidence of prosecution side. The trial court in its report has requested to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54367 of 2021(3) dt.24-11-2021 2/2 provide further six months' time for disposal of the case. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner had been rejected on merits and now no fresh ground is there for reconsideration of the prayer made by the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is once again rejected.
However, as requested by the trial court, let the trial of the case be concluded within six months from today positively.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) Harish/- U T