Rajnish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54443 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna ====================================================== RAJNISH KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE SAKET BIHARI SINGH RESIDENT OF KESHRI NAGAR , RAJIVA NAGAR ROAD NO. 12 P.S - SHASTRI NAGAR DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a), 32 (1), 32(3), 41(1) & 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, (Amendment) 2018.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner rather 201.810

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54443 of 2021(2) dt.04-03-2022 2/2 liters of foreign liquor is said to have been recovered in front of gate of the petitioner's house. He has no concern either with the seized liquor or the place of recovery or any trade of liquor. He has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of his enemy. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and huge recovery of liquor in front of gate of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Trivedi/- U T