Kedar Nath Divedi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15759 of 2016 ====================================================== Kedar Nath Divedi Son of Late Jagdish Dwivedi Resident of VillageMaulanapur, P.O.- Shobhapur, P.S.- Bhelthy, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chhapra. 4.

The Officer-in-charge, Beldy Police Station, P.O. and P.S.- Bheldy, DistrictSaran at Chhapra. 5.

Sri Shaligram Singh Son of Late Baidyanath Singh Resident of Maulapur, P.O.- Shobhapur, P.S.- Bheldy, District- Saran at Chhapra, Saran Division, Chhapra.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arif Abdullah Siddiqui, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 Heard Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arif Abdullah Siddiqui, learned State Counsel.

2. The present application has been preferred: for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to District Magistrate, Saran as well as Superintendent of Police, Saran for providing protection to life personal liberty taking into consideration rights/ entitle upon land situated in Kheshra No. 538 East to N.H.- 102, Mauza- Maulanapur in District of Saran which was forcefully captured by unsocial element exercised muscle ignoring

Patna High Court CWJC No.15759 of 2016(5) dt.04-12-2025 2/2 rights and title upon land and for other necessary relief.

3. A counter affidavit has come on behalf of the State according to which, there is private dispute between Kedar Nath Divedi and Shaligram Singh, the respondent herein on the throwing of the garbage and the said report has been submitted by the Dy.S.P. II, Madhaura Sadar to the superior Police Officers.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to represent before appropriate authority.

5. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U