Boudhi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54394 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Boudhi Yadav Son Of Dhiro Yadav R/O Village- Jagatpur, P.S.- Sahu Parbatta, Dist.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(B), 379, 436, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner along with other co-accused is said to have assaulted the informant and her family members. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54394 of 2021(4) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. He submits that though the injuries found upon the victim are grievous in nature but similarly situated others co-accused has already been granted bail by the coordinate bench of this Court passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.15799 of 2020 dated 28.08.2022. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is admitted land dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No. 01/2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T