Mikki Kumar @ Vikki Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15161 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -490 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Mikki Kumar @ Vikki Kumar, S/o Ram Utim Saw @ Ram Uchit Saw, Resident of Village- Bagwara, P.S.- Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.), DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.) P.S. Case No. 490 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that statement of victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. which has been enclosed as Annexure-3. The victim girl has stated in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. that she has voluntarily gone with this petitioner to Banglore and returned back to home after 4-5 days.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15161 of 2018 (5) dt.24-04-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.) P.S. Case No. 490 of 2015, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T