Md. Arman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17469 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Arman, son of Late Asraf Ali, Resident of Chhapaki, Laxmisagar, P.S. Sadar, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shabana Khatoon D/o Md. Reyaz, R/v Bhalani, P.S. Kaluchi, Dist. Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Vide order dated 28.06.2017, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court, Mediation Centre.

The report submitted by the Mediator is as follows : "Both the parties have appeared along with their counsels and dispute several efforts the matter has been settled on the point that the petitioner will pay Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand) per month which will be paid with effect

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17469 of 2017(4) dt.15-09-2017 2/3 from 01.10.2017 in the Bank account of O.P. No.2 (Shabana Khatoon) and the O.P. No.2 will provide Bank account to the petitioner and the O.P. No.2 will withdraw all the cases filed by her against the petitioner and she will not make claim any thing more from the petitioner and there shall be relationships of husband and wife between them in future and they will be at liberty to live peacefully.

That the above contents of the agreement have been read over and explained to us in Hindi which we have fully understood and accepted there upon.

That in the above terms and conditions a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and both have signed in presence of their learned counsel, who have also put their signature on this agreement paper.

Thus the matter has been settled."

Considering the fact that the matter has already been settled between the parties and the Counsel for the petitioner assures that he will abide by the settlement arrived between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17469 of 2017(4) dt.15-09-2017 3/3 arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Mahila P.S. case No.70 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T