← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54124/2021bail granted

Pappu Yadav @ Papu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-11Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54124 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Siwan ====================================================== PAPPU YADAV @ PAPU YADAV SON OF JAIRAM CHOUDHARY @ JAI RAM YADAV R/O VILLAGE- MATHIA MORE, P.O.- SAHPUR, P.S.- NAWTAN, DIST.- SIWAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Veena Rani Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per the prosecution case, on information having been received a raid was conducted. While one accused was caught two accused persons including the petitioner herein managed to escape. A total of 146 litres of country liquor was recovered.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that neither the petitioner was arrested at the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54124 of 2021(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 He has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 25.3.2021.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner has an antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner not having been arrested at the spot and having remained in custody for more than 11 months, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Excise Case no. C III- 398 of 2020, Tr no 322 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Siwan.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U