Rajesh Kumar Panjiyara And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20029 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Rajesh Kumar Panjiyara, Son of Late Jee Panjiyara, Village - Jagdishpur, P.S- Jagdishpur, District - Bhagalpur. 2.

Praduman Prasad Mandal, Son of Late Jagdish Mandal, Village - Makhduma, P.S.- Amarpur, District - Banka.

3.

Manoj Das, Son of Late Baldeo Das, Village - Pista, Post - Khiribandh, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District - Banka. 4.

Kedar Nath Feta, Son of Arjun Prasad Rajak, Village - Lalkhan Dargah, Post - City Bhagalpur, P.S.- Tatarpur, District - Bhagalpur. 5.

Anil Das, Son of Late Anand Das, Village - Kharwa, Post - Khiribandh, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District - Bhagalpur. 6.

Ashok Kumar Sah, Son of Late Ram Sah, Village - Jagdishpur, P.S. Jagdishpur, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur 3.

The Deputy Director (B.S.H.), Bhagalpur.

4.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 5.

Nazarat Deputy Collector, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Shekhar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Dhirendra Nath Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Partha Sarthi- GA4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioners are claiming that the final decision in the process of appointment of Class-IV employees in the district of Bhagalpur has not been taken. In view of the limited nature of prayer, let the petitioners file a representation for consideration in terms of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20029 of 2016(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2 advertisement and if such representation is filed, the respondent no.4 shall consider the claim of the petitioners in accordance with law and pass a reasoned and speaking within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/ Sunny U