Patna High CourtL.P.A/2030/2016dismissed

Digambar Kumar Mishra And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-28The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2030 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8543 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Digambar Kumar Mishra, son of Janardan Mishra, resident of villageBramhachari, P.S.-Kahalgaon, District-Bhagalpur.

2. Rakesh Kumar Singh, son of Ajit Singh, resident of village-Sohra, P.S.- Krishnagarh (Barahara), District-Bhojpur.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Additional Director General of Police, B.M.P., Pant Bhawan, Patna.

5. The D.I.G., B.M.P., Muzaffarpur, Bela Industrial Area, Muzaffarpur.

6. Sri Satish Kumar, Chairman, Selection Committee-cum-Commandant, at present posted at B.M.P.-4, Dumraon, Buxar.

7. Sri Mansur Ahmad, Commandant, B.M.P.-11/22, Jamui, P.S.-Jamui, DistrictJamui.

8. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna.

9. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Jamui. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Avinash Shekhar For the Respondent/s : Mr. PRABHAT KUMAR VERMA-AAG3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 28-07-2017 This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent has been filed challenging the interlocutory order passed by the writ Court, whereby the prayer made by the appellant for clubbing together the writ application with another writ application for analogous hearing has been rejected.

Merely because the learned writ Court has been refused

Patna High Court LPA No.2030 of 2016 dt.28-07-2017 to consider the prayer of the appellant for clubbing together the writ application with another application for analogous hearing, we see no reason in this proceeding, under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, to interfere in the matter.

The appeal is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Arvind/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 01.08.2017 Transmission Date