← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2068/2024disposed

Pankaj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-30Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2068 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9075 of 2012 ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Singh S/o Late Chandra Shekhar Singh, R/o Police Club, Qr No. GF(B) 4, Salempur, PS. Chapra Town, P.O. and P.S. Saran, Presently atGorkha Road, Chapra, Atal Nagar, Newaji Tola, Purbari, Telpa, PS - Chhapra, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police Personnel, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.

6.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran, Chapra.

7.

Mukund Mohan Srivastava, R/o Village and P.O.- Satjora Pakari, P.S.- Masarakh, Distt.- Chapra, Presently Posted as Clerk In The Scale Of Rs. R,000.00 - 6,000.00, Collectorate, Saran At Chapra. 8.

Satish Kumar, R/O Village- Saraiya, Ward No. 12, Gopalganj, Presently Posted As Clerk In The Scale Of Rs. R,000.00 - 6,000.00, Collectorate, Saran At Chapra.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr. Advocate.

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Additional Advocate General 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2024 Heard Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AAG for the State.

2. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks modification of the order dated 06.05.2024 to the extent that in Paragraph Nos. 9 and 11, the date has been

Patna High Court MJC No.2068 of 2024(3) dt.30-08-2024 2/2 inadvertently typed as 15.07.2001 in place of 15.07.2002.

3. Considering the said to be inadvertent typographical mistake, I find it proper to delete the date 15.07.2001 from Paragraph Nos. 9 and 11 of the order dated 06.05.2024 and in place of 15.07.2001, let it be substituted by 15.07.2002.

4. The order dated 06.05.2024 is modified to the aforesaid extent. The other parts of the order shall remain intact.

5. The present modification application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U