Vikash Kumar Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Raod,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1345 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2026 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Chaubey, Son of Kamleshwar Chaubey, Resident of Village - Chaubey Chak, P.O.- Namaj, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar, Bihar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Raod, Patna.

2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Buxar 4.

The S.H.O., Police Station Brahmpur, Buxar 5.

Dadan Yadav, Son of Hareram Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar 6.

Sanjit Yadav @ Rakesh Yadav, Son of Hareram Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar 7.

Guddu Yadav, Son of Ras Bihari Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar 8.

Sitaram Yadav, Son of Ras Bihari Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Smriti Kumari, Advocate Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Priya Gupta, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 08-07-2026 The corpus has been produced before this Court. The petitioner along with his lawyer is present.

2. This Court has interacted with the corpus. Learned AC to AG has produced the statement of the corpus made before the Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajiv Nagar, Patna. Let it be kept

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1345 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 2/2 on the record.

3. The corpus submits that she was put under pressure to marry earlier. It appears from her statements as also from the interactions, we have with her that she wants to live with her parents.

4. In such circumstance, this writ application fails. It is dismissed accordingly.

5. The corpus is set at-free to go with her parents. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ( Kumar Manish, J) SUSHMA2/- U