Suraj Kumar Aman @ Kartik v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42954 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2024 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Suraj Kumar Aman @ Kartik S/O Durga Ray Resident of VillageBabhangama, Ward No.4, P.S.- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajiv Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his daughter committed suicide based on instigation of petitioner and Himanshu.

4.

It is next submitted that police, after threadbare investigation, came to a considered conclusion that petitioner is innocent and submitted final form exonerating the petitioner of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, but then the learned Trial Court, differing with the police report, took cognizance, as such petitioner apprehends arrest. The learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42954 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 petitioner further submits that when one investigating agency, after threadbare investigation, came to a considered conclusion that petitioner is innocent for want of evidence, whether it would be prudent for this court to send the petitioner to jail based on an order of cognizance, which came to be taken on the same police report, which exonerated the petitioner of the allegations.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 122 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T