Hira Sahni And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23988 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -271 Year- 2017 Thana -BAKHRI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Hira Sahni, Son of Ram Sahni,

2. Birandeo Sahni, Son of Ram Sahni,

3. Bhushan Sahni, Son of Ram Sahni,

4. Agnideo Sahni, Son of Ram Sahni, All residents of Village- Parihara, P.S.- Bakhri, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case No. 271 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 341, 504, 307, 379, 325, 338 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and other family members.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is case and counter case between the parties and all the injuries caused to the informant side was found to be simple in nature except one, which caused on the hand of one Sujit Kumar and so far criminal antecedents are concerned, they are very old. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23988 of 2018 (4) dt.08-05-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Magistrate -V, Begusarai, in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case No. 271 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T