Sarvesh Singh @ Sarvesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47156 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2022 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna ====================================================== SARVESH SINGH @ SARVESH KUMAR SINGH S/O PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH R/O- SAPANA APARTMENT, PS. RAJIV NAGAR, DIST. PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Shri Krishna Puri P.S. Case no. 247 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under sections 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the F.I.R, the informant states that the accused persons including the petitioner herein got a car and forcibily took the informant to his apartment where he has an office. The informant further states that the cause of dispute is his ancestral land in Rajiv Nagar for which his mother had entered into an agreement. The accused persons are pressuring the informant to execute a registered deed. The informant states that the accused persons misbehaved.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47156 of 2023(2) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 reading of the FIR itself it would transpire that it was as a result of differences between the parties over sale of an immovable property for which the mother of the informant had entered into an agreement that this FIR with false allegation has been registered falsely implicating the petitioner herein. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/case/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner appears to be a veteran criminal in so far as he has at least six cases pending against him.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation in the FIR against the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with S.K. Puri Case no. 247 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Patna.

Bibhash (Partha Sarthy, J) U