Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44118/2025dismissed

Sadanand Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44118 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2023 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Sadanand Sah S/O Lakhan Sah @ Dalo Sah Resident of Village- Khoont, P.S.- Jadiya, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Patla Kumari, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP For the Informant :

Ms. Meena Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as informant and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with S.T. No. 231 of 2024 arising out of Jadiya P.S. Case No. 141 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 120(B), 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 21.03.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4848 of 2024, which reads as under: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Jadiya P.S. Case No.141 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44118 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 120- B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioner is said to have shot at the victim causing stomach injury.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 06.08.2023. He is accused in seven more criminal cases.

5. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases pending against the petitioner and conclude the same as early as possible.

4. The trial is on the verge of its conclusion.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to review my earlier order..

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) priyanka/- U T