Patna High CourtCWJC/12909/2016dismissed

Amresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-23The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12909 of 2016 =========================================================== Amresh Kumar, son of Late Pitamber Mishra, resident of Mohalla + P.O. + P.S. - Ishakchak, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur.

4. The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur.

5. The Public Relation Officer-cum-District Programme Officer (Establishment), Bhagalpur.

6. The Principal, Govt. Girls Inter School, Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. D. Sanjay, AAG IX =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 23-08-2017 Petitioner has filed this writ petition in public interest and points out to this Court mismanagement of Government Girls Inter School, Bhagalpur and inconvenience being caused to the lady teachers.

We are informed today during the course of the hearing that the petitioner's wife is working in the school in question as a teacher and various disciplinary actions have been taken against her and as a consequence thereof, this petition has been filed. Produced before us is a communication dated 01.07.2017 issued by the Principal

Patna High Court CWJC No.12909 of 2016 dt.23-08-2017 2/2 of the School indicating these facts.

Taking note of the aforesaid, at the instance of the petitioner in the backdrop of the aforesaid circumstances, we are not inclined to exercise our extra-ordinary jurisdiction in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in public interest. This petition has been filed to safeguard the interest of the wife of the petitioner and we see no reason to make any indulgence into the matter. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 25.08.2017 Transmission Date