← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48077/2024bail granted

Pappu Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-24Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48077 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2023 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== Pappu Ray Son of Rajesh Ray Village- Rajendra Nagar (Madhubani), P.S.- Madhubani, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 165 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, three unknown miscreants snatched Rs. 1,00,000/- and key of motorcycle from the informant and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48077 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/3 further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Suresh Das who was arrested in K. Hat P.S. Case No. 1101 of 2023 and the same has no evidentiary value. No T.I. parade has been conducted in this case. The petitioner has been remanded in this case on 12.12.2023 and has got two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner lastly submits that cognizance has also been taken in this case.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that cognizance has been taken and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 165 of 2023, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48077 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T