← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11372/2017bail granted

Md. Asgar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-01-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11372 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1280 Year-2015 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Md. Asgar S/o Md. Olee @ Md.Olo, Resident of Village- Dharmchandra, P.S.- Tisiauta, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Soni Khatoon @ Rubina Khatoon, W/o Md. Asgar, D/o Late Mansoor, Resident of Village- Brachanda, P.O.- Brahanda, P.S.- Minapur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. MUSTAQUE ALAM, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11372 of 2017(8) dt.04-01-2018 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. Joint prayer has been made on behalf of the parties that the matter has already been settled between them and they are residing together.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., East, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint case No.1280 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T