Akshay Kumar @ Bilku Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16772 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -431 Year- 2016 Thana -DALSINGHSARAI District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Akshay Kumar @ Bilku Sahni Son of Karamchari Sahni Resident of Village- Maniarpur, P.S. Ghataho, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S.Case no.431 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 393, 398, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Petitioners are not named in the FIR and later on his name transpired during the course of investigation of the case. The case is under Section 393, 398 and other Sections of the IPC. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that on confession, the name of the petitioner has transpired and even in the confession there is no allegation of assault against the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16772 of 2018 (3) dt.15-05-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of nature of allegation, this is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail rather let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T