← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15656/2015disposed

Smt. Sunaina Devi v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-05-25Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15656 of 2015 =========================================================== Smt. Sunaina Devi Wife of Late Rfn Kameshwar Prasad, R/o Village- Ahile, P.O.- Kurmichawk, P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Bhojpur (Ara ) Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through Under Secretary, Government of India MHA (EP1) New Delhi.

2. The Director General of Assam Rifles Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Assam, Shilong- 793003.

3. The Commandant 7th Assam Rifles, C/o 56 A.P.O.

4. Record Officer of Directorate General Assam Rifles, Shilong.

5. Dy. Director (Rec.) Directorate General Assam Rifles, Shilong.

6. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-05-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Union of India and State have assisted the Court.

2. The matter has been listed during the Annual Vacation with prior notice to learned counsel that if they do not want the matter to be taken up during the Annual Vacation, a slip to such effect be filed. In the present case, the Court does not find any such slip on record.

3. Yesterday, learned counsel for the petitioner had prayed that the matter be adjourned for the day to enable him to take instructions on the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on

Patna High Court CWJC No.15656 of 2015 dt.25-05-2017 2/2 behalf of respondents no. 2 to 5, disclosing redressal of the grievance of the petitioner.

4. Today, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor any rejoinder to the counter affidavit has been filed. Thus, the statement made on oath in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents no. 2 to 5 with regard to the grievance of the petitioner being redressed, having remained uncontroverted, the Court can only presume that the same is correct.

5. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U