Sunil Suryant v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54369 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2018 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

SUNIL SURYANT Son of Sri Chandra Madhav Singh Resident of Professor Colony, Dahiyawa, P.S.- Chapra Town and district - Siwan. At present residing at M/s Suryant Energy Pvt. Ltd. Flat No. 101, Vijay Shree Complex, Ptrakarnagar, Kankarbagh, Near Rajendra Nagar Terminal, P.S.- Patrakarnagar, District - Patna.

2.

Smt. Manju Singh Wife of Sri Chandra Madhav Singh Resident of Professor Colony, Dahiyawa, P.S.- Chapra Town and district - Siwan. At present residing at M/s Suryant Energy Pvt. Ltd. Flat No. 101, Vijay Shree Complex, Ptrakarnagar, Kankarbagh, Near Rajendra Nagar Terminal, P.S.- Patrakarnagar, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Allahabad Bank, Patna University Branch, Patna through its Chief Manager.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP For O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-09-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No.223 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners are said to have taken loan from Allahabad Bank in the year 2015, but they did not return the loan amount to the Bank.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54369 of 2021(6) dt.12-09-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is submitted that the Bank has already filed case before the DRT in which the Bank has got ex-parte decree. Learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Allahabad Bank opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the fact that the Bank has got ex-parte decree in the case filed before the DRT, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No.223 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T