Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18682/2017bail granted

Sukhdeo Rajbanshi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-28Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18682 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2017 Thana -SIRDALA District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Sukhdeo Rajbanshi, Son of Late Baldeo Rajbanshi

2. Rajesh Yadav, Son of Bishun Mahto

3. Munni Kumari, D/o Sukhdeo Rajbanshi

4. Sarita Devi @ Savita Devi, W/o Chandan Kumar All are resident of village Hazara, P.S Sirdala, District Nawada

5. Mahesh Rajbanshi, S/o Parmeshwar Rajbanshi, resident of village Jandhoul, P.S Sirdala, Dist. Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The statement of the victim-girl reveals that the main allegation is against co-accused Raushan Kumar. The petitioners are family members of Raushan Kumar.

Considering the nature of allegation, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18682 of 2017 (2) dt.28-04-2017 2/2 petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Nawada/successor Court in connection with Sirdala Police Station Case No. 03 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T