Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3997/2021dismissed

Shree Bhagwan Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-27Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3997 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-496 Year-2018 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Shree Bhagwan Sahani, Son Of Late Hiralal Sahni Resident Of Village- Bal Tola P.S- Sugauli, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. J.K. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 17.12.2018, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 496 of 2018 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 20.11.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 42986 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged murder of the informant's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3997 of 2021(2) dt.27-01-2021 2/2 father by the petitioner who is said to have assaulted with gupti in his abdomen. It is submitted that the petitioner has already suffered more two years in custody, and claims clean antecedents.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to take a different view in the matter at this stage. The bail petition stands dismissed with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

5. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T