Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41776/2019dismissed

Masood v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-16Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41776 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2019 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Masood, Aged -25 years, Gender- Male, S/o- Umish R/o- Village- Matyari, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Udbhav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ziaul Quamar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Jokihat PS Case No. 33 of 2019 dated 15.01.2019 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504,/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioner is accused, with three others, of having assaulted the informant and against the petitioner, the specific allegation is of inflicting knife wound on the neck of one person and knife injury on the abdomen of another person.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is discrepancy with regard to the cause for which the Panchyat was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41776 of 2019 dt.16-11-2019 2/2 being held which has resulted in the alleged incident. It was further submitted that there are discrepancies between the versions which has come during investigation.

5. Learned APP and learned counsel for the informant, who has appeared suo motu, submitted that the allegation is specific against the petitioner of having caused knife injury on the neck of a person and knife injury on the stomach of another person, which is corroborated by the injury reports.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to allow the prayer for pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T