Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54277/2021dismissed

Mannu Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-18Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54277 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2021 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Mannu Tiwari Son Of Rewati Tiwari @ Rewati Raman Tiwari R/O VillageKursasan, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No.239 of 2021 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation that has been attributed to the petitioner is that after the assault by the other accused persons, he opened fire which hit on the back of informant's abdomen causing injury to him. The said allegation is supported by the injury report in which wound has been found in the deep back of abdomen margin area.

The said injury no.3 for which the opinion was reserved and later it has been stated in para-127 of the case diary

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54277 of 2021(3) dt.18-05-2022 2/2 that the same has been found to be grievous in nature. There is specific allegation against this petitioner that he opened fire that injured Vinayak Tiwary and as stated above the said injury has been found to be grievous in nature. The petitioner when arrested was having a loaded country-made revolver in his possession.

Considering the aforesaid allegation as also the injury report and the conduct of the petitioner, this Court for the present is not inclined to grant him the privilege of bail which is hereby rejected.

The Trial court is directed to expedite the Trial and conclude it at an earliest.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T