← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43891/2025disposed

Indal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-26Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43891 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2023 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Indal Paswan S/o Late Kari Paswan R/o Vill- Belmohan, P.S.- Fulparas, DisttMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50945 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2023 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Surendra Yadav S/o- Prayag Lal Yadav Village- Dharampur, PS- Laukaha, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43891 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50945 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 43891 of 2025 (Indal Paswan vs. The State of Bihar and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, learned counsel representing in Cr. Misc. No. 50945 of 2025 (Surendra Yadav vs. The State of Bihar) beside Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43891 of 2025(4) dt.26-09-2025 2/3 APP.

2. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 107 of 2023 for the offence punishable under sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 Explosive Substance Act and 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 19.04.2023 by the informant, Bhimsen Ghidia.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that having found fire in the ground floor, it was found that the gate has been cut with the gas cutter whereafter, the accused came, broke the godrej almirah and took away the cash of Rs. 2,30,000/-. The SHO was informed and the police arrived but the accused persons throwing bombs and having fired towards the constables, escaped. The father, who was brutally injured on the head was sent to Laukahi Hospital for treatment. This led to the FIR.

4. The fresh Trial Court report dated 08.09.2025 shows that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined and now statement of the accused is to be recorded.

5. Learned APPs submit that when the trial is at the fag end, it would be appropriate that they face trial.

6. Considering the allegation that has come coupled with the fact that the trial is now at the concluding stage, it

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43891 of 2025(4) dt.26-09-2025 3/3 would be appropriate that the same is concluded by the end of this year.

7. The two bail petitions stand rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T