Md. Jubair @ Jubair Alam And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.17374 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -296 Year- 2017 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Md. Jubair @ Jubair Alam,
2. Md. Sabir, Both Son of Late Sakumuddin @ Akalu, Resident of village Kala Baluwa, Ward No. 06, Police Station Raniganj District Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 296 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner no. 1 is of assault to the brother of informant by means of farsa and allegation against petitioner no. 2 is of assault to the informant by means of dab. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been made accused in the background of land dispute and although there is allegation of assault but the injuries caused to the injured were found to be simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17374 of 2018 (6) dt.11-07-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Araria, in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 296 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T