Aasif Anwar @ Md. Aasif Anwar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44978 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2022 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
AASIF ANWAR @ MD. AASIF ANWAR Sj/o Late Jalil Resident of Village- Basgarha, Chaphari, Ward No. 16, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. 2.
Sajan S/o Aasif Anwar @ Md. Aasif Anwar Resident of Village- Basgarha, Chaphari, Ward No.16, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 37 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant was going to his house by his vehicle and reached near house of Dr. Ashok, several accused persons including the petitioner pulled him out from the vehicle and assaulted him on his head by means of sharp cutting weapon with intention to kill him as a result of which he received head injury and it is furhter alleged that accused persons have snatched Rs. 20,000/- from his pocket.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 44978 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are is innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Due to business rivalry, altercation took place between both the parties. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have received injuries in alleged occurrence. They have got no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 37 of 2022, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Purnea subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U