Mauje Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19104 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -PIPRAHI District- SHEOHAR ======================================================
1. Mauje Ram, Son of Late Rambriksh Ram,
2. Bittu Raut @ Bittu Kumar, Son of Chhotan Raut,
3. Chhota Raut @ Chotan Raut Son of Late Kamal Raut,
4. Krishnandan Ram Son of Sri Narayan Ram,
5. Rajesh Ram Son of Mauje Ram,
6. Munan Ram, Son of Mauje Ram,
7. Surat Ram Son of Nanhak Ram,
8. Lakhind Ram @ Lakhindra Ram, Son of Ganga Ram,
9. Gagandev Ram Son of Buluch Ram,
10. Shambhu Ram Son of Suman Ran @ Soman Ram,
11. Harikishore Ram Son of Soman Ram,
12. Mahesh Ram, Son of Vaidyanath Ram,
13. Bindeshwar Ram Son of Vaidyanath Ram, All Resident of VillageMohanpur, P.S.- Piprahi, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and the learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Piprahi P.S Case No. 13 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 354, 379, 427, 436 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, for contesting the election, the petitioners after forming unlawful assembly, entered into the house of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19104 of 2017 (3) dt.25-05-2017 2/2 informant and took away cash of Rs. 50,000/- along with ornaments, clothes and other articles and they also damaged the tiles and burnt the house. All the family members of the informant injured and they are being treated at Piprahi Primary Health Center.
Submission is of false implication and that there is case and counter case. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. The entire prosecution story appears not probable and reliable and, as such, the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail by submitting that against all the petitioners there is allegation that they burnt the house and took away ornaments, cash and clothes of the informant.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the allegations attributed against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant privilege of pre-arrest to them and accordingly, their such prayer stands rejected in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 13 of 2017 pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Sheohar.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T