Ajay Kumar Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.153 of 2016 IN C. REV. 133 of 2015 =========================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh S/o Sri Badan Singh, resident of Village - Daudpur, P.S. - Daudpur, District - Saran, Bihar.
.... .... Appellant
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, Govt. of India.
2. The Indian Oil Corporation, through its Chairman Ali Jawan Jung Marg Bandra (East) Mumbai.
3. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited ( M.D.), Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan 5th Floor, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna.
4. Indian Oil Corporation Limited ( M.D.), Muzaffarpur Divisional Office, Krishna Complex, Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur.
5. Director (Marketing), Govt. of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
6. Satyendra Kumar Singh @ Satyendra Singh, S/o Late Uma Shankar Singh, resident of Village - Mahivan, P.O. - Gurukul Mahiyan, P.S. - Chapra, Muzaffarpur Muffassil, District - Chapra Saran.
.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant : None For Union of India : Mrs. Kanak Verma, CGC For Indian Oil Corporation : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma, Advocate.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 05-12-2016 None has appeared for the appellant.
2. The order dated 23rd of September, 2015 passed by the learned Single Bench in Civil Review No. 133 of 2015 declining to review the order dated 6th of February, 2015 is subject matter of challenge in the present appeal. The learned Single Bench in the order under appeal found that there is no error apparent on the face of record.
Patna High Court LPA No.153 of 2016 dt.05-12-2016 2/2
3. The order dated 6th of February, 2015 is not the subject matter of challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The learned Single Bench has set aside the process of allotment of dealer of kerosene oil at Jalalpur in the district of Saran vide the said order and directed that a fresh advertisement be published by giving benefit of age relaxation only to the writ applicants to participate in the interview.
4. Such direction was issued in view of the fact that the first advertisement for appointment of a dealer of kerosene oil was published on 9th of May, 2000. The allotment became subject matter of challenge on a number of occasions and for 15 years the matter could not be decided. Thus it was ordered that a fresh selection process be carried out after inviting fresh applications.
5. We do not find any error in the order passed by the learned Single Bench in review which may warrant interference in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The same is accordingly dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Vikash Jain, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 08.12.2016 Transmission Date B.T/Ibrar N.A.