Lal Babu Soni v. The Principal Secretary Department Of Health Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1420 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9704 of 2011 ====================================================== Lal Babu Soni son of Late Mahabir Prasad Singh, resident of village - Laxmanpur, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Sri Brajesh Malhotra.

2. The Director-in-Chief, Health Service, Bihar, Patna, Sri Dr. R.D. Ranjan.

3. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna, Sri Dr. K. K. Mishra.

4. The Additional Chief Medical Officer, Patna, Sri. Dr. Saroj Singh.

5. The Superintendent, Guru Gobind Hospital, Patna City, Patna, Sri Dr. Mukesh Kumar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Advocate : Ms. Shruti Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2015 By way of filing the present application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks initiation of a contempt proceeding against the respondents for their willful disobedience to the order passed by this court on 11.02.2015 in C.W.J.C. No. 9704 of 2011.

A show cause has been filed by opposite party no. 2, the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna, in which it has been stated that the direction issued by this Court vide order 11.2.2015 in CWJC No.9704 of 2011 has already been

Patna High Court MJC No.1420 of 2015 (5) dt.03-12-2015 2/2 complied with and a reasoned order has been passed by him on the representation of the petitioner on 1st December, 2015, wherein a direction has been issued to the Civil Surgeon, Patna/Director, Super Speciality Eye Centre, Rajendra Nagar, Patna, to ensure the payment of salary of the petitioner from November, 2010 to 6th March, 2012.

After going through the show cause reply filed on behalf of opposite party no.2, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, the petitioner does not intend to press this application. In that view of the matter, the application is disposed of. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T