Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40493 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2020 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAJESH KUMAR son of Surendra Singh Resident of Village- Mohammadur Turi, P.S.- Goraul, Katahara O.P., District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-03-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Goraul P.S. Case No. 282 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, one country made Katta has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2020. Chargesheet has already been submitted. Considering the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40493 of 2020(3) dt.23-03-2021 2/2 Chief Judicial Magistrate V, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 282 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T