Pintu Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Patna, Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1062 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2017 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Pintu Jaiswal son of Late Tej Narayan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Janipur, Murgiyachak, in front of Naya Makan, P.O.- Sorampur, P.S.- Janipur Dist.- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Patna, Bihar 2.
The Inspector General of Police, Patna.
3.
The Deputy Inspector General of police, Patna. 4.
The District Magistrate, Patna.
5.
the Superintendent of Police, Patna.
6.
The Police Inspector, Gardanibagh, P.O.- Anishabad, PS.- Gardanibagh, Dist.- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate Mr. P.K.Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Manish Kumar, G.P.-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2019 This application has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The prayer of the petitioner in paragraph-1 of the application reads as under:
"1. That, this Cr. Writ application is being preferred for issuance of an appropriate order/orders, direction/directions, to concerned authority for consideration adjudication and necessary legal action upon the complaint presented by the informant. The concerned Police Station or investigating officer of the
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1062 of 2019(2) dt.15-07-2019 2/2 case is to connivance of accused for deeds and misdeeds referred there in which caused the unhealthy atmosphere and failure of the administration due to the personal grudged and ill motive and for other necessary relief/reliefs on the basis of facts and circumstances of the case enumerated and stated hereinafter."
From the prayer made in paragraph-1 and the pleadings made in the application, the Court is unable to comprehend as to what relief the petitioner seeks in the instant case. The petition is absolutely vague and the prayer is beyond comprehension.
In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/- U T